Is Extra Maternity Leave Bad for Child Cognitive Development?

Photo: Varin Tsai

Back in March we wrote about a Norwegian study which showed that an increase in maternity leave led to lower high-school dropout rates for the children of those moms. But a new working paper about maternity leave in Canada (abstract here) highlights some possible negative effects of extra maternity — specifically on a child’s cognitive development at ages 4 and 5. At issue isn’t the extra time a mother spends with her child, but the timing of when she returns to work, and the abrupt change it causes.

Michael Baker of the University of Toronto and Kevin Milligan of The University of British Columbia focused their research on a Canadian law passed at the end of 2000 that extended maternity leave from 6 months to a full year. As a result, the timing of the return to work changed from an average of just under 6 months to nearly 9 months:

We find that the expansion of parental leave — and the resulting extra time mothers spent with their child in his/her first year of life—had no positive impact on indices of children’s cognitive and behavioral development; this despite the fact it had substantial impacts on the maternal care and non-licensed non-parental care children received in their first year, as well as how long they were breastfed. For our behavioral indices we can rule out all but very modest improvements. For our cognitive measures the estimated impact of the reform is small, negative and statistically significant for PPVT and Who Am I? This latter result highlights the relatively neglected issue of how changes in maternity leave laws affect the timing of the mothers’ return to work. Specifically, it is consistent with the hypothesis that some ages are better than others for abrupt changes in the parent-child relationship.

Leave A Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

 

COMMENTS: 3

View All Comments »
  1. V Smith says:

    When one leaves their 1 to 3 year old in child care, the risk for Reactive Attachment Dissorder increases. RAD is common in foster and adopted children, but when a child’s biological mother is “checked out” or leaves the child in someone else’s care for too long, they experience an internal trauma (abandonment): “mom left me, I’m not good enough, I have to take care of myself to survive, I will never truly trust anyone again.” Dr. Faye Snyder is one of many RAD experts and she has helped me treat my own daughter.

    Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 12 Thumb down 14
  2. Enter your name says:

    It would be interesting to see whether this negative effect is seen in mothers who work part-time. Presumably “gone in mornings” or “gone occasionally” isn’t as big a change as “gone five days a week, ten hours a day”. Also, it would be interesting to know whether a gentler transition to outside child care (e.g., the baby spent one afternoon a week in a “mother’s day out” program for several months before the mother returns to full-time work) would mitigate the change.

    Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  3. Jenna Black says:

    That’s interesting that extra maternity leave had NO impact on cognitive development. However, “children whose mothers take longer leaves have been found to have lower mortality rates and higher test scores.” I recently read a great article that sums up the stages of cognitive development in children @ http://www.inspireeducation.net.au/blog/kids-health-stages-of-cognitive-development-in-children/. I guess this is great that cognitive development will not be effected by mothers choice to stay home or return to work!

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0