If All the Economists Were Laid End to End, Would They Reach a Conclusion?

There is an old quip, attributed to George Bernard Shaw, that if all the economists were laid end to end, they’d never reach a conclusion.

My own experience has always been just the opposite. Most economists think very much alike.

If you want to feel like the smartest person in the room, often a good way to accomplish this is to be the only economist. Frequently, the one economist will say things that make a lot of sense that no one else would ever come up with.  When I am that one economist, I sometimes feel like a genius.  Until a second economist enters the room, that is.  Because when the second economist shows up, he or she often says all the smart things I was going to say, before I can say them.  It turns out, it is not the economist who is brilliant, but rather the training we get as economists which leads us to think differently from non-economists, that sometimes makes us seem smart. 

So was George Bernard Shaw right?  The data have something to say on this issue.  A panel of economic experts assembled by the Initiative on Global Markets at Chicago’s Booth School of Business weighs in from time to time on the issues of the day.  These are very prominent academic economics representing a wide ideological spectrum.

They are asked whether they strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with the position posed in the question.  They can also say they are uncertain or have no opinion.  For the purposes of my analysis, I will lump together “strongly agree” and “agree,” and do the same with “strongly disagree” and “disagree.”  I ignore anyone who says uncertain or has no opinion.

Well, it turns out that economists – at least these 40 economists – agree on just about everything thrown at them so far.  I had my crack research assistant Maria Ibanez go through every question they’ve ever been asked and compute how much agreement there is by question. Of the fourteen questions posed to them thus far, on nine of them every single economist shared the same opinion! Not a single dissenter in the bunch.  There has only been one question in which fewer than 80 percent of the economists are on the same side of the issue.  That was a question on education, where the group split roughly two-thirds/one-third when asked whether vouchers were a good idea.

Leave A Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

 

COMMENTS: 23

View All Comments »
  1. Becca says:

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    Disliked! Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 16
  2. ryan says:

    Hope all of you economists’ arms are ok- must be tough to twist your arms to pat yourself on the back that way.

    Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 30 Thumb down 11
  3. VBinNV says:

    If all the economists were getting laid (end-to-end or otherwise) they would likely reach more hastily drawn conclusions.

    Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 8
  4. 164 says:

    Of course it all depends on what questions you are asking. You are likely to se dissagreement on topics involving free market solutions vs government solutions. Also optimal income distribution, and approaches to alleviate poverty.

    Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 1
  5. Eric M. Jones. says:

    It is a key tenet of “Science” that agreement on a particular factoid doesn’t really mean very much. Scientists don’t get together to have a hand-raising vote to determine what reality looks like. Nor would scientists engage in a mass rejection of some new strange idea (e.g. maybe there were 0, 2, 3, or more Big Bangs). That’s why many scientists are really not too interested in AGW whilst many non-scientist people are waving signs and shouting.

    So finding out that many or most Economists agree on questions might be more an indication that new ideas and new blood is desperately needed. The current economic conditions would indicate exactly that.

    You couldn’t get a job teaching psychology in 1960 unless you thought Sigmund Freud was the penultimate genius. Now you can’t get a job if you think he was.

    Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 5
    • DK says:

      “You couldn’t get a job teaching psychology in 1960 unless you thought Sigmund Freud was the penultimate genius. Now you can’t get a job if you think he was.”

      The second-to-last genius?

      Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 2
    • wiseacre says:

      Many scientists are not interested in AGW??? If you mean that many,in fact most,scientists don’t study climate change,I agree with you. If you are referring to those who do,i.e. climatologists,they are very interested and very concerned and many of them have been out there shouting with the sign wavers.

      Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  6. Nosybear says:

    So… Brilliant groupthink is still groupthink?

    Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 2
  7. Mike says:

    If the topic of conversation is about economics or related to economics, I expect the economist in the room to be the most intelligent.

    If the topic of conversation is medicine, a lawsuit, religion, or rocket science, the economist in the room might be the least intelligent.

    Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 18 Thumb down 3
  8. James says:

    “…it is not the economist who is brilliant, but rather the training we get as economists which leads us to think differently from non-economists, that sometimes makes us seem smart.”

    Or perhaps it’s that training which leads you to believe that the statements made by that other economist – who of course studied the same dogma at their divinity school… excuse me, of course I meant to write school of economics :-) are brilliant, even when they bear no connection to actual reality.

    Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 7