Contraception and the Gender Wage Gap

(Photo: Amber McNamara)

The male-female wage gap narrowed considerably during the 1980s and 1990s, thanks to increased educational attainment among women and an influx of women into high-earning fields.  Factors such as the Women’s Movement and the 1964 Civil Rights Act are often cited as the drivers of this shift, but economists are also narrowing in on another influence: the Pill. Economists have linked the Pill to “delays in marriage (among college goers) and motherhood, changes in selection into motherhood, increased educational attainment, labor-force participation, and occupational upgrading among college graduates.”  Now, a new working paper (ungated version) by Martha J. BaileyBrad Hershbein, and Amalia R. Miller examines the effect of the Pill on the male-female wage gap.  From the paper:

[O]ur main results show that early access to the Pill lowered women’s wages in their early twenties (corresponding to the 1970s) but raised their wages in their thirties and forties (corresponding to the 1980s and 1990s). By their late forties, women with early access to the Pill earned a statistically-significant hourly premium of 8 percent—enough to account for between a third and half of the total hourly wage gains for these cohorts over their peers born a decade earlier. Consistent with the well-known relationship of women’s wage growth to cumulative labor-force experience, our decomposition indicates that almost two-thirds of the Pill-induced wage premium at the mean is explained through its effect on women’s labor-force experience. Another third of the premium is due to changes in educational attainment and occupational choice.

Interestingly, the authors found that the effects of the pill were strongest for “women in the middle of the IQ distribution and with some college.”

 

Leave A Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

 

COMMENTS: 6

View All Comments »
  1. J1 says:

    Didn’t Loretta Lynn cover all of this about 40 years ago?

    Oops – should have checked the link. She’s cited in one of the NBER papers . http://www.nber.org/papers/w14675.pdf?new_window=1

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Jaeyoung Lee says:

    Very interesting topic

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2
  3. frankenduf says:

    it’s a relative gap- women have more money when they don’t have to buy all those damn diapers

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 4
  4. Enter your name... says:

    Why are they specifically studying oral contraceptives and not other forms of contraception?

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Doug says:

    So, if a woman has fewer kids, then she less likely to take time off work to stay home with them.

    Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
    • pawnman says:

      And thus, she’s seen around the office, she doesn’t have gaps in her knowledge about various projects being undertaken by her employer, and (in the worst cases), she doesn’t have to quit her job for the first 4-5 years then attempt to re-enter the market with a gap in her employment history.

      I wonder if telecommuting is closing this gap for mothers? It seems like allowing them to work from home would prevent some of the “out-of-the-loop” problems that common sense (but perhaps not research) would imply is the reason for the gap between women without kids and women with kids.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0