It’s Not You, It’s the Data

At McSweeney’s, Josh Freedman breaks up with his girlfriend, economist-style:

Susan, we need to talk. I’ve been doing a lot of thinking lately. About us. I really like you, but ever since we met in that econ class in college I knew there was something missing from how I felt: quantitative reasoning. We can say we love each other all we want, but I just can’t trust it without the data. And after performing an in-depth cost-benefit analysis of our relationship, I just don’t think this is working out.

Please know that this decision was not rash. In fact, it was anything but—it was completely devoid of emotion. I just made a series of quantitative calculations, culled from available OECD data on comparable families and conservative estimates of future likelihoods. I then assigned weights to various “feelings” based on importance, as judged by the relevant scholarly literature. From this, it was easy to determine that given all of the options available, the winning decision on both cost-effectiveness and comparative-effectiveness grounds was to see other people.

(HT: Greg Mankiw)

Leave A Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.



View All Comments »
  1. Russell Harris says:

    Went to a wedding once and the groom in his speech revealed he had done a SWOT analysis before popping the question … didn’t go down well with the new in-laws.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. GB says:

    Given the ubiquity of Google searches I believe Josh has failed to consider the deleterius impact this statement will have on any future partnerships.

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  3. roger rath says:

    Would that it were so easy. Remember we live in the grey area.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Jay Cox says:

    I love this… every time I think about it I chuckle a little bit.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0