Steal This E-Book?

(Photo: Drathus)

Digital rights management, or DRM, is a set of technologies used to control piracy. An example is the “Fairplay” system that Apple used until recently on most songs sold in its iTunes store. Fairplay was a set of digital locks that blocked certain uses – for example, a song could be played only on up to five authorized computers. As you might imagine, DRM has been controversial, at least among some people who want to make uses of content they’ve purchased – like making a back-up copy, or copying small portions of a work for fair use purposes. Music DRM once involved the installation – without users’ knowledge — of a particularly malicious bit of software that modified, and sometimes broke, the operating systems of customers’ computers.  That strategy imploded amidst government investigations, class-action lawsuits, and a storm of terrible publicity. In contrast, e-book DRM has been nowhere near as controversial, or ineffective. Still, the fact remains that many DRM-haters exist.

Given this, the question is occasionally raised whether DRM prevents enough piracy to make it worthwhile for a content distributor to annoy some of its customers.  The dominant view is that without DRM, e-books are liable to be distributed for free over file sharing networks and this will lead in turn to reduced author and publisher profits and falling production of books. But some suggest that DRM makes little difference, and publishers would do well to get rid of it. Those who can afford to buy books, songs, films, etc., don’t pirate them. Those who pirate aren’t otherwise going to buy.

So which view is right? We now have an interesting bit of evidence on that point. It comes from Tor Books, a science fiction and fantasy publisher based in Britain, but with a substantial U.S. presence.  Tor announced in April 2012, just over a year ago, that it was removing DRM from its e-books.  This was a big deal in the world of DRM-haters. Now, one year later, Tor has announced that the experiment had largely been successful – that is, Tor sees little evidence of increased piracy of their e-books following the removal of DRM — and that the publisher will be keeping its e-books DRM-free. The significance of this experiment is a little unclear—sci-fi readers, Internet geeks, and DRM-haters are three groups that overlap more than a little—but nonetheless, it is an interesting move for a fairly large publisher. In Tor’s words

For our particular readership, we felt it was an essential and fair move. The genre community is close-knit, with a huge on-line presence, and with publishers, authors and fans having closer communication than perhaps some other areas of publishing do. Having been in direct contact with our readers, we were aware of how frustrated many of them were by DRM. Our authors had also expressed concerns at the restrictions imposed by the copyright coding applied to their ebooks. When both authors and readers are talking from the same page, it makes sense for the publishers to sit up, listen and take note—and we did!

Take note of something Tor has said here – the sci-fi genre community is “close-knit”, at least relative to the broader community of book readers. This is important, because a relatively small community with members that communicate with one another is more likely to follow anti-piracy norms  — that is, informal rules against piracy — than is a bigger, more diffuse community. So if Tor gives its readers freedom, but asks them to respect authors’ interests, its readers are more likely to obey – at least if Tor and its authors remain in readers’ good graces.

When we made the announcement there was an immediate reaction from the media. The Guardian explained how ‘Tor rips up the rulebook on digital rights management’ and the BBC featured a long article with arguments from both sides, drawing links with the music industry’s experience of the transition and highlighting that “the key difference with the music business is that the book trade can see what mistakes the record labels made and avoid them.”

If you’re going to get rid of DRM, you might as well enjoy some good press. And Tor has. 

But the most heartening reaction for us was from the readers and authors who were thrilled that we’d listened and actually done something about a key issue that was so close to their hearts. They almost broke Twitter and Facebook with their enthusiastic responses. Gary Gibson, author of The Thousand Emperors tweeted: “Best news I’ve heard all day.” Jay Kristoff, author of Stormdancer, called it “a visionary and dramatic step . . . a victory for consumers, and a red-letter day in the history of publishing.”

China Miéville called the decision “a game changer” and long-time anti-DRM author and blogger Cory Doctorow praised the decision on both the Guardian Technology Blog and boing boing, the blog he co-edits: “I think that this might be the watershed for e-book DRM, the turning point that marks the moment at which all e-books end up DRM-free. It’s a good day.”

And Charles Stross, author of the Merchant Princes series, recently said “I’m happy to see that Tor have gone DRM-free with their e-book editions. DRM doesn’t impede pirates, but it subjects honest customers to a monopoly tightly controlled by the owners of the DRM software, reducing readers’ freedom and hampering competition.”

We had readers contact us directly explaining how “DRM is anti-customer” and how pleased they were by this “forward thinking step.”

The move has been a hugely positive one for us, it’s helped establish Tor and Tor UK as an imprint that listens to its readers and authors when they approach us with a mutual concern—and for that we’ve gained an amazing amount of support and loyalty from the community. And a year on we’re still pleased that we took this step with the imprint and continue to publish all of Tor UK’s titles DRM-free.

Well, whether DRM impedes pirates or not is precisely the relevant question. Tor says they haven’t noticed any increase in piracy of their e-books following the removal of DRM. They are, however, cagey about how they know this.  Probably it’s a combination of their sales projections being met, and also not seeing increased traffic in their books on notorious filesharing sites.  As a rough-and-ready measure of piracy, that’s probably pretty good, although by no means definitive. The bottom line is that a lot more data is needed.  Tor hasn’t experienced an apparent increase in piracy – would the same be true for a general-interest publisher? For a children’s book publisher? For a college textbook publisher? And what about other forms of media that are currently subject to DRM? Tor’s experience is a useful first step. Are there any other companies out there who currently use DRM but are willing to remove it and see what happens?

Leave A Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.



View All Comments »
  1. mik says:

    The point as far as the publisher is concerned is whether it affected sales – who cares about “piracy” (that’s what shipping insurance is for).

    A lot of the peer-to-peer trading is either people wanting to flip through the book before buying the dead-tree of it, or people who already have the dead tree and just want to read it on their phone, rather than lugging a log around with them.

    The flip side of this is that DRM doesn’t actually work, can’t work, and definitely shouldn’t work.

    It involves asking your customer’s computers to ignore the owner of the computer and do what some random publisher wants. It’s clearly morally wrong (note: saying that the alternative is free-for-all copying is a false dichotomy), technically infeasible, and it’s hard to see why anyone would hand over cash for it, especially since the items are non-essential.

    As far as what the customer wants, it’s clear that non-drm is winning in the music industry and book industry (the drm players aren’t getting return business once people find a non-drm store). The movie industry is holding out, but those guys have always been crazy and self-destructive.

    Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  2. Aidan says:

    It’s a strange coincidence that you write on this topic just after I’ve been stung by e-book DRM. (Bought a book on my girlfriend’s kindle, she bought me my own kindle; can’t transfer the book across – very annoying)

    It reminds me of this fascinating and amusing story of software piracy:

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Ransome says:

    DRM assumes that most people are dishonest. If this was so most Western societies would implode. Imagine – most people are shop lifters. Security couldn’t cope. By the way I’m not saying non-Western societies are dishonest, just that the incentives are different.

    I’m pretty typical of most people. always seems to fall in the middle of surveys etc, and I don’t buy DRM protected products. Can’t be bothered with it so subscribe to a pay to view and watch that. Mind you I’m an old fart so I’m under no pressure to appear hip or up to date.

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  4. pawnman says:

    Neil Gaiman actually came out in favor of piracy a while back. He released his book, “American Gods” for free on the publisher’s website. Sales of the book increased.

    As he says, if you think about your favorite author, the one who you pre-order the books for, wait in line to get a signature, follow them on Twitter or Facebook…the first time you read one of their books, you probably didn’t pay for it. You probably borrowed it from a friend, or a library.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. SAO says:

    While they all wail about piracy in foreign countries, most sellers would prefer to keep prices high in their biggest markets than figure out how to sell to and at what price to sell to the millions of non-native English speakers who want to practice their English by reading and don’t have western credit cards or other things that western stores assume everyone has.

    Textbooks are widely pirated. Copy shops have long been important parts of the college ecosystem. I understand than many third world universities use western textbooks which few students can afford to (or do) pay for.

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  6. Anthony Tsang says:

    Until I read this posting, I had no idea DRM is an uninvited guest with my downloads from iTune. Actually I don’t mind. I have nothing to fear. Rather, I find highly suspected hackers around me in coffee shops in Hong Kong far more irritating to say the least.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Judge Mental says:

    I hate this subject because a) dealing with DRM is a pain in the butt and b) my friends and family give me an extremely hard time over what they perceive as my “goody two-shoes” mentality. Some get overtly angry with me when I won’t use my technical expertise to help them circumvent copy protection. I will *never* lecture someone about piracy, just don’t ask me to do it. I will gladly help you work thru DRM issues to lend a book, but please don’t ask me to make an illegal copy.

    Contrary to the experience of most people here, it is has been my experience that most people don’t see book (or music) piracy as wrong in the least. I don’t think most people are dishonest, but for whatever reason, they seem to view piracy in the same light as going 1 mile over the speed limit.

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
  8. Don Sakers says:

    I’m wondering why you decided that Tor is “based in Britain”? All my life (as a professional science fiction writer and book reviewer) Tor has been located in New York City.

    I’m very much afraid that when I read this, I stopped giving any credibility to other facts cited in your article. Perhaps you make a good argument, or perhaps everything you say is suspect…I just don’t have the time to investigate every “fact” you cite.

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0