Setting Off Alarm Bells at Work

What can a person do to set off alarm bells at work?

I don’t mean this figuratively, I mean it literally — actual sirens going off in the office.

In most office environments, to trigger an alarm you would need to start a fire under a smoke detector, try to exit through an emergency door, or perhaps break into a safe.

At the administrative headquarters of the Chicago Public Schools, there is another activity that will set off alarms.? A friend of mine, Susanne Neckermann, found this out the hard way on a recent visit there.

Here’s how Susanne described it to me:

I went down to the Chicago Public Schools office today to talk about administrative issues surrounding a field experiment I’m conducting in the schools. As it turns out, none of the people that I wanted to reach were in their offices, so I ended up sitting there working away on my laptops using the guest wireless login.

Getting tired of “business” mails, I clicked on a link to facebook in one of my emails. The second that I clicked on that link an enormous alarm went off.

Apparently, the use of such internet sites is not tolerated by CPS and rather than block those websites altogether, accessing them causes this ear-piercing noise to go off that sounds something like a fire-department wagon passing directly by you.

Horrified, I was able to navigate away from the page as fast as I could, which made the noise stop. I must have looked quite stunned and glanced over at the CPS person that was with us in the room. She stated quite matter of factly, “Oh, did you try to go to facebook or youtube? They instituted that alarm as some sort of public shaming.”

The idea of the alarm is actually quite interesting from a deterrence standpoint.? The most straightforward thing for an employer to do to keep employees from using a particular website at work is just to make that website inaccessible from the work-based network.? (Many Islamic countries adopt this approach; when I was in Dubai, I discovered that they would not let me get access to the website where I bet on horse racing, which I thought was quite odd given that some of the biggest horse races in the world occur in Dubai.)

While denying access to particular websites will keep workers off those banned sites, there may be close substitutes available.? For instance, if the goal is to prevent workers from looking at pornography, there are thousands of competing sites.? It might not be easy to figure out how to ban every one of these.? Indeed, employees might spend more time searching for sites that are not banned than they would have spent on the banned sites in the first place.

In that regard, there is a certain brilliance to the alarm bell approach.? The firm lets people know that certain classes of sites are banned, and that an alarm will go off when they hit one of those sites.? The firm gives the workers an incomplete list of which sites are banned.? Thus, the worker can never be quite sure when they go to a site that should be banned (but may or may not actually be alarmed due to the difficulty of identifying and banning every naughty site), if they will trigger the alarm.? The firm turns the information asymmetry that exists between the worker and the firm into a tool that works for the firm instead of against it.

The other good thing about an alarm, as opposed to an outright ban on a site, is that there may be times when a worker really does want to get to a banned site for a good and important reason.? It will be unpleasant while the worker is on the site because of the alarm, but at least the option exists.

So hats off to the folks at the Chicago Public Schools for finding a clever solution to a tough problem.? Let’s hope they teach that cleverness to the students in the system.

And let’s hope that visiting the Freakonomics blog doesn’t trigger any alarms.


Tim

Do their speakers not have an off button?

Brett Legree

Yes, it's always good when companies treat employees like children, rather than just weeding out people who can't get their work done.

If you're getting your job done on time and it's not costing the company any extra money, then this is all about control, pure and simple - and I don't want to work there.

(FWIW, I have left companies like this. What next, telling me what to eat while I'm at work?)

Sally

Set up a VPN to a home computer. It will encrypt the traffic so the content filter won't catch it. I'm sure some high school kids will know how to accomplish this. Those students could even rent out their VPN connection to other students.

Richard A. Breuer

And isn't it grand that the Chicago schools find it necessary or appropriate to control the internet use of their guests.

Perhaps they should take a page from the Lower Merion School District in Pennsylvania and install screen capture and webcam capture software on everyone's computers.

Who will watch the watchers?

Mike

How do they instantly know it's YOU that is accessing the site so as to publicly shame? Aren't there a thousand people in the building? How does it know when you are off a site if a website isn't constantly streaming?

Tom Woolf

Going under the assumption that the alarm was coming from CPS speakers, and not the computer speakers, I'd give CPS a huge FAIL on this one.

Besides the aforementioned "treating adults like children" situation, scaring the crap out of everybody within earshot just because *somebody* accessed Facebook is just wrong.

Yes - shaming is a very good method to keep folks in line (at least until they start using their smart-phones to access those sites), but couldn't they have at least made the vehicle for shame a bit less like "HOLY CRAP THE BUILDING'S ON FIRE... WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!" How about a recorded message playing that calmly states "access to that site is not permitted... please log off", repeated?

Thom

Yes, "hats off" to the CPS for restricting a visitor (not even on their payroll) from accessing a common website. Instead of allowing a bored visitor to harmlessly surf a non-controversial website they felt it necessary to distract employees who are on the public payroll with a loud, completely unnecessary alarm. Awesome. Maybe my employer will institute this "clever solution" and I can stop getting any work done as well. I look forward to a day when, instead of concentrating on my work with the occasional visit to a non-business related website, I instead get to sit in my cubicle listening to an "enormous alarm" sound every so often.

Dave

If the alarm is on the individuals computer, it is trivially stopped by the user. If the alarm is instead in the building, then the system does nothing to identify who is the offender and fails anyway.

Dan

I can't imagine this is aimed at shaming students--it would only work on teachers and staff. Among students, it would mainly be used by hooligans looking for new ways of being disruptive.

bob

so anyone could stand near this building, use their wifi and set off alarms inside? sounds like fun ... where is this building again....?

Dan

Fantastic idea. Another interruption in the classroom is exactly what the CPS needs, I'm sure. And training people to ignore alarms is an added bonus.

A real win-win. Hats off the the CPS, indeed. I assume Mr. Levitt will soon be working under similar conditions, right?

Grant

Won't this just prompt people to start using proxy sites? I guess you can block those, too. Still, as pointed out above, this is pretty easy to circumvent for someone with a moderate amount of computer knowledge.

Stacy

Oh, get over it. I'm guessing none of you went to school when the internet existed, because nowadays, students can't even access Google Image search to get pictures for projects. And forget going on a blog or clicking on any link in an email. Wanted to use the internet at school to read up on something because you don't have internet at home? Forget it.
There's an entire portion of people devoted to finding "innapropriate" sites to block, including everything from Ebay to Wikipedia (some school districts believe Wikipedia isn't a reliable source)
And because children can handle it, you guys should be able to. They're not being paid to go to school. YOU are being paid to DO YOUR WORK.

Svavar

I wouldn't last a week at a job like that.

While I agree with #2 that companies shouldn't treat their employees like children, government jobs tend to attract apathetic people and it's very hard to get rid of under-performing government workers.

So, when you can't fire them for looking at Facebook/YouTube/porn all day, this may be the last resort.

MJ Person

Was there some response on the web-browser/e-mail linking the alarm to the website?

I mean, if I'm sitting in a waiting room fussing with my laptop, and suddenly an alarm goes off, "quickly navigating away from the page" is not going to be my first response. I'd look around, decide it's a fire alarm, pack up, and head outside.

How did you decide navigating to Facebook triggered an alarm?

Svavar

Also, for those who think companies should force employees to spend every minute "working", you should look into the Results-Only Work Environment strategy.

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_50/b4013001.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ROWE

Andy

Wow. Based on the comments, it seems that nobody gets the point of this article.

Bananen

Unlike school administrates, children are not stupid and tht students surely all know the one easy solution: Proxy

jarugn

To quote my good friend John McEnroe, " Are you serious?"

di

Apparently the entertainment value of watching the new person jump three feet in the air is worth the disruption.