This Is Not Another Great Depression

Few people in the world know more about the Great Depression than economic historian Price Fishback, which is why whenever he offers an opinion on the subject, I always listen carefully. Back in the fall, Fishback wrote two outstanding posts here at the Freakonomics blog, one on what the New Deal tells us about the likely success of the stimulus package, and another on the Home Owners Loan Corporation.

Fishback is back, with a three-part series explaining why our current economic situation is very, very different from the Great Depression. In the first of these three posts, Fishback reviews the basic macroeconomic statistics then and now. My description might make it sound dry, but it absolutely is not; this is must-read stuff. I suspect you will be stunned at how bad the Great Depression really was.

How Does the Current Crisis Compare to the Great Depression?
By Price Fishback
A Guest Post

Over the past couple of decades, every time we have experienced a slowdown in the American economy, the media mentioned the possibility that this is the next Great Depression. Maybe this is a natural response to the relative lack of downturns over the past 20 years. After experiencing a downturn once every three to seven years for nearly two centuries, the U.S. economy has been averaging a downturn about once every nine or ten years since the early 1980′s. As declines in the economy have become rarer, perhaps people have become more sensitive to them.

In the 1920′s, Soviet economist Nikolai Kondratiev argued for the existence of 40- to 60-year economic super-cycles. Since the Great Depression ended nearly 70 years ago, maybe we are overdue for the next one.

The events of the last year naturally have stimulated comparisons to the Great Depression. Two years ago, few would have ever guessed that there would be no pure major investment banks left on Wall Street. The banking industry is struggling, as many financial institutions face uncertainty about the values of their assets, particularly financial instruments related to mortgages. The U.S. and most of the rest of the world are in recession. Meanwhile, the stock market has lost roughly 40 percent of its value from the all-time peak it reached in late 2007.

How does this compare to the Great Depression? We won’t know the final outcome of this recession for a while, but I can safely say that the current situation is nowhere near as bad as the situation during the 1930′s. There may be surface similarities on some dimensions, but there are far more differences than there are similarities.

Since the start of the recession in late 2007, the monthly unemployment rate has risen from 4.9 percent to 7.6 percent in January 2009. Before thinking about the Great Depression, realize that unemployment rates have exceeded 7 percent in 139 months since World War II. This includes 32 months between 1974 and 1977, 76 months between 1980 and 1986, and 21 more between 1991 and 1993. The Great Depression was far more disastrous. One year after the stock market crash of 1929, the unemployment rate had risen from 2 percent to 10.8 percent. The next year it was 16.8 percent. Then unemployment rates rose above 20 percent for four straight years!

It does not end there. The unemployment rate exceeded 14 percent for five more years until finally dropping below 10 percent again in 1941. These rates include emergency workers, but these were people who were working for their relief payments at hourly wages that were roughly half the norm on other government projects. We treat people receiving unemployment benefits today as unemployed, and all they are required to do is seek work.

Do I sound like your grandparent talking about walking barefoot and backward several miles through the snow to go to school? There’s more. Real G.D.P. fell during the last two quarters, but real G.D.P. in the fourth quarter of 2008 was almost identical to real G.D.P. in the fourth quarter of 2007. Since World War II, there have been 28 quarters where real G.D.P. was below the same quarter in the prior year. How does this compare with the Great Depression? In 1930, Americans produced 8.6 percent fewer final goods and services than in 1929, in 1931 15 percent less, and in 1932 and 1933 roughly 26 percent less than in 1929. It is hard to conceptualize such a drop in G.D.P.

Consider this: the 1932 and 1933 figures would have been the equivalent of shutting down all production of goods and services west of the Mississippi River. Annual real G.D.P. did not reach its 1929 level again until 1936. We are experiencing pain now, but the problems of the Great Depression were several magnitudes greater.

Leave A Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

 

COMMENTS: 65

View All Comments »
  1. Tom says:

    Yet

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Rey says:

    From Americans for Democratic Action:

    “Real Unemployment at 15.8%: Highest Level Since ADA Began Tracking

    WASHINGTON – May 8 – The real unemployment rate released today by the Bureau of Labor Statistics is 15.8%, nearly 7 points higher than the rate officially reported.

    The real rate includes marginally attached workers which the BLS reports “are neither working nor looking for work but indicate that they want and are available for a job and have looked for work sometime in the recent past. Discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached, have given a job-market related reason for not looking currently for a job. Persons employed part time for economic reasons are those who want and are available for full-time work but have had to settle for a part-time schedule.”

    Since April 2008, 6 million people have lost their job. ADA’s Real Rate of Unemployment represents a staggering 23 million people who are unemployed or underemployed.

    The increase of another 563,000 jobless claims for April 2009 was the smallest rise in 6 months, providing some evidence that government stimulus is working but underscoring the urgent need to put more government dollars to work motivating the private sector to begin hiring laid-off workers. “

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Evan Rowe says:

    Exactly. The Great Depression was where in 1929? In 1930 the house didn’t even change parties (lack of popular unease with the status quo??) FDR doesn’t even get the New Deal policies until the middle of 1933.

    There are plenty of freakonomics multivariate reasons for why this may be the big one. But clearly part of it will boil down to the length of the downturn in terms of time.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Levi says:

    ah ha ha. “Yet” …..there’s always one.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Mike says:

    Probably right. Maybe. Today we have Social Security, $250,000 deposit insurance (when Bonnie and Clyde robbed a bank in the depression, the government wasn’t watching your back), Medicare, and unemployment insurance to soften the blow. But, at the same time, the bankers were wiped out in that Darwinian world, too, not practically rewarded for their almost criminal behavior to survive and prosper and profit from the deflated assets they helped create.

    I think our big worry is the impending Great Hyperinflation of the 21st century. Buy Tips.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. Dimitri Maex says:

    Glad to hear that because I heard that according to Kondratieff we are entering a winter of severe depression that can last up to 20 years … .

    I recently put this post on my blog about the correlation between the length of skirts and the recession. I wonder whether you are familiar with the theories of Prof Helmut Gaus and if so, what you think of them :

    http://thedoublethink.com/2009/05/the-length-of-skirts-in-a-recession/

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. JW says:

    What’s with the “yet” comment? That one word symbolizes the doom and gloom attitude of politicos and media types trying to push a specific agenda right now. Sure, if you are one of the affected – it’s not all that good. But the situation is hardly worthy of comparing to the Great Depression.

    Oh yeah, back to your comment. “Yet” you say? I haven’t been hit by a bus or crashed in a plane…..”yet”, but in the meantime I am going to focus on the positive things that are happening and not wait around for something that could possibly happen. Focus on what you can control right now instead of screaming “the sky is falling!”, and work to protect your future – in private.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. Lito says:

    This is great stuff! Kudos to the Freako folks for bringing back Fishback. I wish there were more short, balanced, empirically-driven accounts like this is the blogosphere right now.

    Amity Schlaes (rightly) gets the back of the hand without even a mention of her name, but so do the knee-jerk millenarian lefties assuming that (finally, finally!) the capitalists have gotten our comeuppance and the last crisis of capitalism/birth of socialism is upon us. Calling spades is not a team sport.

    But more importantly, what one gets from this post that has been difficult to find of late is a huge and entirely necessary dose of perspective. Like throwing water on a dog too frenzied with a squirrel in a tree to hear his master, Fishback reminds us to keep our cool. Crisis is a relative term.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0