SuperFreakonomics in the News

There’s a price war going on among booksellers — WalMart is offering a handful of big new books for just $10, which forced Amazon to counter — but unfortunately, SuperFreakonomics is not one of them. On Amazon, it costs $16.19. Is it worth it?

To help you decide, here’s a roundup of some early notices for the book:

  • TIME magazine: “It’s very good — jauntier and more assured than their first.
  • Telegraph: “As one of the most successful writing partnerships in publishing, they make an entirely complementary and logical team in the same way that Jack Spratt and his wife did at the dinner table.”
  • Smart Money: “SuperFreakonomics provides a refreshingly logical look at some divisive political problems, with studies that encourage the reader to look beyond the surface and to question common wisdom.”
  • EconLog: “If everyone read SuperFreakonomics and believed it, the world would change for the better.”
  • Wallet Pop: “It’s a book that will get you thinking after, if not before, any decision you make based on an incentive.”

And in The Week, Dubner and Levitt offer a list of six books they loved. Several have already been mentioned on this blog, and then there’s Sustainable Energy — Without the Hot Air, by David J.C. MacKay. Here’s what they write:

Anyone who wants to understand global warming — and not everyone does, since they’ve got their platitudes to defend — needs to find a ­physicist to cut through the fog. MacKay might be your man. His clarifying mantra: “Numbers, not adjectives.” Go ahead and unplug your phone charger every night if you must, he writes, but that’s the equivalent to “bailing the Titanic with a teaspoon.”

Leave A Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

 

COMMENTS: 34

View All Comments »
  1. Tristan says:

    I’ve already got it on my Wishlist on Amazon, $16.19 is certainly worth it, especially if I pick up another book or two at the same time and get free shipping.

    Althugh, I did just see this critique of the Global Cooling section, which seems well thought out: http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/12/superfreakonomics-errors-levitt-caldeira-myhrvold/

    Is there any plan to respond?

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Eric says:

    So… what about ClimateProgress’ review? And Krugman’s endorsement of it?

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. anon reader says:

    Well, the price wars are everywhere in Internet (like iPhone software in apple store) now.

    As Economists, and as book writers, what do you think?
    Does it damages you to go so low?

    Ps: Wait just till Google starts selling e-books, then we will see the real war!

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  4. Carey says:

    I think it is fair, since this blog is functioning at the moment as an ad for the authors’ new book, to comment on whether they should be rewarded by having blog readers buy it.

    My take on the authors’ (self-assigned) brief is to show how hard-nosed data-driven analysis can overturn preconceptions about how the world works.

    If the authors fulfill this expectation on the part of the reader, then they have earned the price of the book. If not, then they haven’t and shouldn’t be rewarded by having it purchased (this is how economic incentives should help keep authors honest).

    The advance word is not looking good though. Contrarianism is all well and good – as long as you make a solid case. The fairly detailed summary of what the book contains on this issue by the Union of Concerned Scientists looks like a retread of well-worn and thoroughly discredited climate change denialism.

    This puts the faithful reader in a bit of bind. I can’t in good faith reward the authors for inferior work, but I’ll have to wait awhile before I can snag the book from the library to confirm the assessment made by others. On the plus side, if I am persuaded that my doubts are incorrect, I will then buy the book anyway.

    Incidentally – I gave several copies of the first book as gifts. I obviously won’t do that again if the book does not stand up to unsentimental critique.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Robin says:

    I just pre-ordered today. Did you guys see you were mentioned unfavorably in Paul Krugman’s blog this morning?

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. Dr. Manak says:

    Tell me again how solar cells increase global warming because they absorb the light that hits them and reradiates it as heat? – this just in from superfreakanomics – did you forget basic physics and biology? – plants absorb most light that hits them (with the exception of green) and re-radiate it as heat too and they cover most of the land on the earth? so I guess by that reasoning plants cause global warming too – now that is counterintuitive… back to school you guys. Look up the word albiedo – the earth is 70% covered by water too – the earth in general absorbs a very large fraction of the light incident upon it (70%) – so adding some solar panels isn’t going to change anything – they are just mimicing what plant do anyway…

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Bjorn says:

    I bought my copy for 23 dollars including shipping. Swedes value your books more than the average american!

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. Kevin MN says:

    As a fan of the first book, I must say I’m pretty disappointed that the new book is more concerned about making partisan political points than actually looking at the facts about Global Warming. Its hard enough to justify economics as a science to my hard science colleagues and work like this hurts the profession’s reputation.

    I really hope we can get some sort of response from the authors because it really makes no sense how they think they can ignore basic scientific facts without their readers realizing it.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0