The Math of Pringles

P&G recently sold Pringles for $1.5 billion to Diamond Foods. But do you know why the chip is so easy to eat? University of Chicago mathematics professor Benson Farb explains why the design of the Pringle owes much to Einstein‘s theory of relativity.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Leave A Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

 

COMMENTS: 13


  1. Laney says:

    The video says it was sold for $2.3 billion, not $1.5 billion…?

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. YX says:

    Pringles had about 800k in debt that DF assumed, making total transaction 2.3b

    Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  3. Toothy says:

    As expected the video was completely off the mark when it comes to science, the chip owes nothing to Einsteins theory of relativity.

    It just happens to slightly resemble a shape that is described by a certain equation that has been around for a lot longer then Einstein, but as it happens it is also used to describe the space in this theory.

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  4. VB in NV says:

    “when you crunch the numbers…” Aw, Brian.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. caleb b says:

    PRINGLES ARE NOT CHIPS!!!!

    Pringles are potato snacks. Be careful or the chip industry will slap you with a huge lawsuit.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  6. glaxaco says:

    I’ve always found it interesting that Pringles neither crushed the “classic” potato chip competition, nor died out, but instead found equilibrium as something of a niche product. Similarly, although I assume their patents have long since run out, I’ve never seen anyone else produce a Pringles-like chip. I like them, but I also like Lays and Ruffles (not that I buy a lot of potato chips).

    Also, I agree with Toothy – the shape is sometimes referred to as a negatively curved 2-D surface, analogous to (3-D) curved spaces that Einstein talked about in his General theory of relativity, but the mathematical shape had been around long before Einstein.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • John says:

      “Similarly, although I assume their patents have long since run out, I’ve never seen anyone else produce a Pringles-like chip.”

      What about Lays Stax? They are usually right next to Pringles on the chip aisle at the supermarket.
      http://www.google.com/search?q=lays+stax

      I seem to remember seeing some similar store brands as well last time I went. Definitely some competition.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • steve says:

      The analogy weaker than weak, to the point of absurdity.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. John Schwabacher says:

    Spoiler alert: the video contains no information other than saying that the shape of a Pringle is a hyperbolic paraboloid. The alleged link to relativistic physics is asserted, but not discussed. Lame!

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. AaronS says:

    PRINGLES OWES IT’S SHAPE TO JOHN WAYNE!!!

    Can’t anyone tell a saddle from a hyperbolic paraboloid anymore! What in the world are they teaching our kids anyway?

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • daver says:

      Hmm, that’s a good point. More people are familiar with Pringles now than with saddles–maybe they’ll start referring to them as “Pringle points” rather than “saddle points”. Plus, it’s alliterative.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  9. Julia says:

    Mmmmm the video sais Diamond Foods paid 2,5 billion dollars but the article says 1,5, someone could check that?

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  10. Alex says:

    He made the comment that it was a hyperbolic paraboloid but didn’t explain why it owed anything to the theory of relativity.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0