Buyout Package Bingo: A Reason to Choose More Work for Same Pay?

An example of irrationality? A colleague at another university was offered a buy-out package: a full year’s pay if he would resign/retire at the end of the current semester. At the same time, his school also offered a phased retirement deal: two years at half-pay, with half a usual teaching load.

This economist chose to take the phased retirement, thus choosing the same pay, but teaching four courses over two years instead of no teaching. I think he’s crazy; but I think you can write down a utility function that is consistent with his behavior and violates none of our assumptions about preferences.

Leave A Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.



View All Comments »
  1. Rusty says:

    Retirement is boring and a full work load is too stressful. Why not have something in between?

    I would also ask what the employer gets from this arrangement. Is the part-time worker more productive since he is happier and has more free time, or is he less productive since he is less invested in the firm?

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. Bob says:

    Seems smart to me. By staying employed his pension conti8nues to grow, If he is 10 1/2 or older, staying employed means delaying the RMDs from university linked retirements accounts. These two factors more than make up for the reduced salary. And he stays involved. Good thinking, I’d say,

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0