Should H&R Block Hire Models to Increase Charitable Giving?

(Photo: zyphbear)

(Photo: zyphbear)

Our recent podcast “How to Raise Money Without Killing a Kitten” represented the launch of a fund-raising campaign for Freakonomics Radio. Let me say a few things about the campaign:

1. Wow! Listeners have so far responded way, way, way better than Levitt predicted they would in the podcast — so: 1a) Thanks!; and 1b) Nice job in proving a pretty smart guy very wrong.

2. Some of your comments and e-mails noted that WNYC’s fund-raising site doesn’t allow for contributions via PayPal, text, Flattr, Bitcoin, etc. That is true. Hopefully some of these avenues will be added over time. Some of you also noted that the podcast already has advertising, so why are we also asking for contributions from listeners? Good question. Short answer: WNYC is the funding producer of our podcast, and as such is responsible for paying all our producer and engineer salaries, studio time, field-recording costs, music-licensing costs, bandwidth, and a million other things, like the transcription of interviews (for every minute of talking that ends up in the podcast, we’ve probably got about five minutes of interview tape). We are grateful for the advertisers on our podcast, but that revenue is not nearly enough to produce the podcast. That’s why we came to you, our listeners, for additional support. Think of how cable TV stations make their money: yes, they sell advertising but they also extract a subscriber fee from each viewer. (And that, in a nutshell, is why cable is having an easier go of it these days than broadcast TV; if you want to learn more about this, especially the early days of cable, take a look at the book Those Guys Have All the Fun: Inside the World of ESPN, a fantastic oral history of ESPN.) Since our subscriber fee is zero (i.e., the podcast is free), we are using the standard public-radio funding method of asking for voluntary support.

3. Your comments and e-mails were also a great window into a better understanding of what makes someone want to donate to a given cause or not. You pointed out incentives we overlooked, or overvalued, or undervalued. Between blog comments, e-mails, and comments on the fund-raising site itself, there was a lot of feedback! Some scholar wishing to some day write a case study of a modern fund-raising campaign could do worse than to study this one. Here, for instance, is one my favorite comments, from a reader named Eric Kennedy:

Great show. However, you forgot a primary reason why people donate to charity: to impress their attractive tax preparers. I’m not kidding. I’m very attractive and worked as a tax preparer for two years. I’ve seen this first-hand. I now find myself considering the impression I will make on my attractive tax preparer.
The most effective way to boost nation-wide charitable giving, would be to staff H&R Block with models and encourage them to make comments about the size of people’s annual donation amounts.

Leave A Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.



View All Comments »
  1. Enter your name... says:

    I wonder what percentage of people use a tax-preparer service. (We always do ours at home.)

    Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
  2. Matt says:

    I do my girlfriend’s taxes for her, and she finds me quite attractive. Should I be pushing her harder to make charitable donations?

    Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
  3. John Brennan says:

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    Disliked! Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 12
  4. James says:

    “That’s why we came to you, our listeners, for additional support.”

    Just one slight problem: I’m not a listener. I read the blog (and yes, often the transcripts of podcasts), but would never listen to a podcast. (Among other reasons, there’s bandwidth: I can read a transcript in a small fraction of the time it would take me to listen to it.) So why am I being asked to donate to cover the cost of producing the podcast?

    Now if your advertising revenue doesn’t cover the cost of the blog, I might consider a contribution, if asked nicely :-)

    Thumb up 4 Thumb down 4
  5. Lew says:

    I like it. H & R Hooters income tax preparation. Of course, a lot of guys would be making up donations just to impress the preparer. Sort of limited on the demographic it would appeal to, however.

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  6. Enter your name... says:

    I thought most people (80%?) didn’t itemize their deductions and thus it wouldn’t matter anyway. And it doesn’t work on women, so we’re talking about an intervention that might work on just 10% of the population (20% of the men).

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  7. Voice of Reason says:

    Isn’t the whole point of impressing an attractive women for the hope that you might eventually date her, or take her to bed? I think that the likelihood of you wooing your tax preparer would be pretty low. So that should be a factor as well in the study.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. ctb says:

    Hmmm – just read this today & immediately thought of you guys….

    Does Studying Economics Breed Greed?

    Among other things, the studies cited showed that economists were less likely to give to charity & their donations were smaller than non-economists.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Eric says:

      Interesting article. “More than twice as many economics professors gave zero dollars to charity than professors from the other fields.”

      I hope the economics professors at the University of Chicago give at least $1 to charity.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0