When a Fake Banksy Is a Real Banksy

(Photo: Tim Fuller)

(Photo: Tim Fuller)

Many news outlets this week carried the story that Banksy, the celebrated British street artist, had set up an innocuous-looking booth near Central Park that offered original signed works for $60 each—despite their value being much closer to $60,000 apiece.  Even with this astounding discount, only a handful were sold—as this video, posted on Banksy’s website, shows:

What’s interesting to us is what this says about art and the role of copies. While copying is a huge concern in many art forms—especially music and film—in fine art, it is comparatively insignificant. In China, there are whole villages full of artisans devoted to copying the great masters of Western art, and certainly fakes and frauds are well known in the West as well. Yet there is not a thriving black market in Banksy knockoffs—or, for that matter, in the work of other major contemporary artists.  Why is that?

One might argue that original art somehow has a special quality because a brilliant artist made it with his or her hands. But since a lot of art is not really produced by the artist directly, but instead by assistants working on his or her guidance, it would seem that a very close copy of a valuable and aesthetically-interesting work should be almost as desirable as the real thing. (And we will put aside for the moment video and sound art, which, being digital, are perfectly suited to copying.) If one is simply buying art as an investment, provenance is clearly critical—and perhaps that is what drives a lot of the high-end art market. But for those who buy art for art’s sake (let’s assume those people exist), it is much less clear why it matters if the work is an original or a (very close) copy. This is especially true when originals can cost millions and copies a miniscule fraction.

In the case of Banksy’s booth, much of the media commentary presumed that the works were ignored by passersby because they were assumed to be fakes. Yet this only begs the question of why fakes are not desirable, given that very few of the people who walked by the booth—if any—could ever afford or would ever pay for the real thing. If you love Banksy’s work and style, $60 seems like an attractive price to pay for a well-executed fake.

One last point. An interesting thing about this story that hasn’t been addressed as much in the media commentary is that Walmart sells Bansky prints. And as you might expect from Walmart, the prices are very low. They can be had for even less than at the celebrated Banksy booth:  $57.99.

TAGS: ,

Leave A Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

 

COMMENTS: 15

View All Comments »
  1. Erin Percival Carter says:

    George Newman and Paul Bloom have interesting thoughts on exactly this. They boil down artistic valuation to perception of the creation as a unique performance and degree of contact (contagion) with the artist. It’s a nice paper: http://www.yale.edu/minddevlab/papers/art-and-authenticity.pdf

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  2. Gregory Pearson says:

    Yeah, if I could buy an original Banksy for $60 I probably would, but to resell, not to hang on my wall.

    What it may also say is that what the art establishment defines as great art has little relationship to what people actually like.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  3. Dave Cicirelli says:

    You may want to check out our artist response / social experiment to this.

    We saw an opportunity to make a statement about hype, persona, and the value of art with our Fake Banksy booth. We went to the same location a week later , and sold certified “Fake Banksy” canvases for the same price. We sold out in an hour.

    Check it out.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mKCZ0SXRXuI

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0