Search the Site

Is This What a Newspaper War Looks Like?

I am a longtime reader of (and contributor to) the New York Times who also happens to love reading The Wall Street Journal, and I live in New York City. So yesterday was a particularly noteworthy day, for the Journal launched its long-anticipated “Greater New York” section.
If we are to believe the billions of preemptive articles written on this topic (journalists care deeply about stories about journalism, though practically no one else does), the Journal‘s metro section was designed by owner Rupert Murdoch as a direct assault on the Times‘s metro section in order to steal the hearts and minds of readers and the ad dollars of New York advertisers.
Business concerns aside, I am personally happy to have more quality journalism about the city where I live. (And more jobs for journalist friends: the Journal is one of the few — the only? — newspapers to do any serious hiring during the recent falling-off-the-cliff era.) I have no idea how this newspaper war will play out, or, frankly, if it even is a “newspaper war.” New York City is a huge, influential, and unique market, and there’d be all kinds of reasons for the Journal to have strong New York coverage (just as it makes sense for the Times to have strong business coverage) even if Murdoch didn’t care at all about warring with the Times.
But reading yesterday’s inaugural Greater New York section of the Journal, I couldn’t help but think that the stories are indeed true.
It’s not that the Journal directly attacked the Times in any way. But in terms of story selection, the Journal‘s psyche seemed curiously illuminating: article after article (good ones, too) about two competitors slugging it out, quintessential “winning and losing” stories, with the implicit message that we live in a winner-take-all world. Among the articles:

Conflict is of course central to news coverage, and a heightened sense of competition is what makes many of us love New York. Even when a game isn’t truly zero-sum, it can be exciting to pretend it is. But if the Journal ever writes up a story about how my kids fight over the Wii remote, I’ll know it’s gone too far.