Selling My Addiction

An unusual auction began late yesterday on eBay.? I’m selling my “right to regain weight.”? Why would anyone in their right mind be willing to pay me cash to buy this right?? What does this even mean?


It’s simple.? The winner of the auction wins the rights to receive any forfeitures on my stickK weight maintenance contracts over the course of the next year.? As I say in the eBay item description:

Following the auction’s close (and as soon as I receive payment from the auction winner), I will designate the winner as the recipient of any forfeiture payments made on my? maintenance contracts for the next 52 weeks.

Any week during this 52-week period where

(i)????????????????? I fail to report to stickK my progress on the contract;

(ii)??????????????? I report that my weight is above 185; or

(iii)?????????????? My referee, Barry Nalebuff (Yale game-theorist and Ayres coauthor), reports that my weight is above 185 lbs

the auction winner will receive $500.

So, I’m selling the right to receive any and all stickK forfeitures during the next year.? I’m auctioning my stickK contracts.? Since I’m putting $500 at risk each week, the auction winner will receive somewhere between $0 and $26,000.

Further, I’ll send a free copy of my new book?Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done to the commenter who posts (before Oct. 1) the best prediction of what the winning bid will end up being.? The auction ends on October 8.

I’m predicting that I will not be paid very much.? Even though I’ve had a hard time staying below 200 pounds in the past (and even include?a picture of myself in one of my heavier phases), I, like Subway’s Jared, have all kinds of incentive to keep my weight in check.? I’m probably one of the few eBay sellers who warns bidders not to bid too much:

If I fail in each and every week, the auction winner could receive as much as $26,000.??But beware: my weight on August 4, 2010 is about 180 lbs.? I intend to make sure that my weight stays below 185 lbs throughout the 52 weeks – so it is possible, even probable, that the auction winner will not receive any forfeiture money.??It would be foolhardy to bid very much on this item.

The idea for this auction comes from?James Hurman, a New Zealand advertising executive, who in 2008 successfully sold his smoking addiction.? You can learn more about James and how you can sell your weaknesses in?chapter 3 of my book.

One of the themes of Carrots and Sticks is that “participation matters.”? A commitment contract is only going to help you if you can bring yourself to sign it.? Many people are reluctant to sign up for the risk of losing money.? The “Hurman” auction responds directly to this concern by compensating you in advance for taking this risk.?? Behavioralists tend to think that the only people who would sign up for a stickK contract are those people who have a willpower problem AND are sophisticated enough to know they have a problem.? The less sophisticated will be overly optimistic about their future resolve.? These “naifs” won’t take the trouble to sign up for a stickK contract because they don’t think they’ll need it.? But the “Hurman” auction flips this concern on its head.? The unsophisticated will be compensated with cash today for taking on a chance of forfeiture that they overoptimistically believe is very small.? The “naifs” should be the first in line for Hurman auction commitments.

Michael Abramowicz and I have written a long (56 pages!) academic article,?Compensating Commitments: The Law and Economics of Commitment Bonds That Compensate for the Possibility of Forfeiture, teasing out the intricacies of compensated commitments.? For example, it turns out that there is a family of incentive-equivalent compensating commitments.? Imagine a smoker who wishes to create a $10,000 incentive to quit smoking (and the $10k incentive will create a 40% success rate).? This can be implemented with “ex ante” compensation where the smoker promises to pay a $10,000 forfeiture if he smokes and an ex ante auction offers to pay him $6,000 today for a chance to receive the forfeiture.? This is just a version of the Hurman auction.? Notice that the auction is also a kind of prediction market that tells you your probability of success.

But a similar result could be achieved with what Abramowicz and I call “Ex post” or “Wager” auction implementations.? These alternative implementations vary the amount that must be paid in compensation by the auction winner ex post if the smoker succeeds.? For example, a $6,000 contingent ex post compensation is an actuarially fair exchange for the chance to earn $4,000 if the smoker fails and creates a $10,000 incentive to quit smoking.? Or alternatively, the smoker might pay a bookie a $4,000 wager and win $10,000 if he kicks the habit.


More generally, by varying “K” in the last row of this table, it is possible to devise an infinite number of auctions that in neo-classical models would produce incentive-equivalent and actuarially fair results.? The multiplicity of incentive-equivalent options is important because when more behaviorally realistic features are added to the model, the different auctions have very different advantages and disadvantages.

When it comes to my own auction, the willingness to bid should turn in part on whether people can trust whether I’m actually keeping the weight off.? You can keep track of how I’m doing on my maintenance contract?here.? On September 27, I weighed 182 pounds.


I'm predicting $499.50


If the auction is limited to people with no personal stake in your outcome, I guess the limit to be around $500 because if the result is significantly more than $500, you have a financial incentive to bulk up for the next weigh in, pay off the first week $500 and keep the rest of the money, and restart the process having only lost one week of thinness. Plus, if the first weigh in happens in the new year and you already know the outcome of the auction, you'll be extra tempted by rich holiday foods.

A more interesting scenario would be if the buyer has resale rights after some months pass and the vested account balance grows. If you were to include a put option, where after say 6 months, the buyer could sell it back to you at a pre-agreed price, then the auction value might approach the discounted strike price of the put.

However, I don't know your background, but if you have, for instance, a sibiling with whom you've had sibiling rivalry as a child, having bragging rights to hold over you in the event of failure might be priceless to them. If there are people with a personal interest in either your success or your failure involved in the bids, this wouldn't hold.



Final bid prediction: $17.15. (If the final bid is lower than this, I'll bid this amount to get the free copy of the book, which is available at Amazon for $17.16)

Justin James

I will GLADLY bid on this (currently the high bidder).


Because I've been down this road, and I know for a fact that if things like the risk of heart disease and diabetes aren't incentive enough for you, no amount of money is either. It's a shame this wasn't for smoking (that took me more than 10 years to beat) or drug use, then I'd be willing to bid hundreds of dollars on this.



I'll bid $$$. Cheesecake is in the mail.

Ian Kemmish

So this would make Pere Gourier's chosen method of murder not only entirely legal but profitable as well? Killing someone who is already overweight would be unlikely to require $26,000 in raw (or cooked) materials.


I predict $250. You may realistically only slip up once, maybe twice max, and so bidding anymore than half the amount that will be gained from one week's slip up and the return becomes less than 1:1.


1:1, as in the profit to be made may only match your winning bid, that is. And so higher bids would reduce the profit level to a value less than the bid, though of course it would still be profit. Assuming Mr Ayres does only slip up the once that is...






I'm guessing that you'll get $74 for the auction. I'm terrible at judging how much people are willing to pay for things so this is just a wild guess.

Eric M. Jones

Allan Sherman (Hello Muddah, Hello Faddah...) was suffering from all the ills of consumption....alcoholism, smoking, obesity, and the attendant secondary problems. He had a friend who was sheriff in a small town who agreed to lock him up voluntarily for some months to see if his habits could be brought under control. Of course, the deal was "Whatever I say, and I mean it, don't let me out!"

Result?: After a day or two in the clink, Sherman threatened such hellish retribution and lawsuits on the sheriff that the sheriff let him out and told him never to call again.

Allan Sherman died November 20, 1973, age 48


I'd anticipate probably 1 slip-up, either not checking in, or simply some extra holiday weight or a bad weigh-in. The winning big will probably end up around 325 is my guess.


Careful! The SEC might get wind of this and be very interested.


I predict $128 for the final bid.

Brian F.

I predict $501.


Do we really want people to leverage up their incentive default contracts? Will the hedge funds be far behind? It's only a matter of time before someone starts buying them all up and offering IDS^2. Here comes the next bubble.

Nate C.

I actually think the chances that you'll forget to post an update to the site are higher than the chances you'll weigh more than 185.


My guess: $228


Looking at a person's track record is very likely to indicate future results. I think you will pay out 0, partly because the story for your next book is much better that way!

However, unless you mean to exclude half your potential audience, I suggest using the gender-indeterminate "they" instead of "he" in your section on imagining a smoker. It's old-fashioned and off-putting.